Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id C8L4OBq98WXprAAAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:50:02 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:50:02 -0300 Received: from mta5.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.8]:35326) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkPvF-000BSq-2R for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:50:02 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post: X-CSA-Complaints:MIME-Version:List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=msTaPf7wjb8HfaQxWu3XUDE3SPssUosX+sYu6DK73rs=; b=Ipo4j1tGnE+mUMT8Lx2GxljKjHIGQfwxKh/x2ex5Et1GcRJZaod3thNv5zImCUyZn3ypdQUZklil /UvKhrAQ+4XFoyJ+m8bNrhY3rwnJo00k07m/uxF++Ag66ovDNOiULZ55ggn48VCgpMUe7ykpEWLP fpiDr7CZOv754mC9+PkgbnkAPzbJtep6fYkQxFrEhPTXHtfLY3ROZV0xmxrPZBKnEammctspEJlJ x5dAVShfrG0zmnlpuHk9Beu03ETyINLHDKl+nphQFax0qLrG+QN5qGwqpRujbhY8CTS47kbSjsnC F4ZliJ5L7fQi4ay7/sEwKpmhTBrHPID60y2zHQ== Received: by mta5.hello.avon.com id hu6ugq2fmd4f for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:49:07 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?8J+aqCBBbGVydGEgZGUgc3BvaWxlcg==?= Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:49:07 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click X-CSA-Complaints: csa-complaints@eco.de x-CSA-Compliance-Source: SFMC MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_736195 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"ZNWJFg4LwMOQ=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 X-Spam-Score: -72 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-7.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF welcome-list -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment X-Spam-Flag: NO