Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id +LqkNN+iFmZZSQAAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300 Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:44984) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1ruYz9-0004tT-1v for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version: List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=rANXgr6qzT5u8iSTqIglklM3tZI2f32i4x1LJkJMeLA=; b=2t9F19otNlNdSTz8a1P1Y7wOBvPkKujekqzlWTWuXtScEqdGOjIxmv8WZGg4DwUFN+qlIGATHj3O AOygApA/CQAwlg3AMNHzuO86L7VdT/FjYL8nM7i0Rf33AuWpvlKoQ7AGIsmS2FpkV/RBiFkflgrU QCS5TYsU4AdVjGlUUdPRuJ5if4TNyLg/qAvEe/q5CrCNrtaCseGj7v5Ys/vT7+vb1aRRcXRDvAH5 rw3Foz/Qx0nuxHxHNUxPYyjaksM90B7Aq1iLfffrVXPVr0pQWCdRRmQxcoUSUcq+wJaz9uh3LwuI ceJiMWtFerqv61pWCseWpPI7So+AFGvstJHeEg== Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id h2qhd42fmd43 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:31:05 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Beijo_bom_=C3=A9_com_Batom_Avon?= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:31:05 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_742396 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"79UoAY0jGIY8=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 X-Spam-Score: -150 X-Spam-Bar: --------------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-15.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM welcome-list -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF welcome-list 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author\'s domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML X-Spam-Flag: NO