Return-Path:
Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Received: from cloud.mkt.tools
by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP
id +LqkNN+iFmZZSQAAaNiWHg
(envelope-from )
for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300
Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:44984)
by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.96.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1ruYz9-0004tT-1v
for renata@bewonderful.com.br;
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:31:59 -0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version:
List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com;
bh=rANXgr6qzT5u8iSTqIglklM3tZI2f32i4x1LJkJMeLA=;
b=2t9F19otNlNdSTz8a1P1Y7wOBvPkKujekqzlWTWuXtScEqdGOjIxmv8WZGg4DwUFN+qlIGATHj3O
AOygApA/CQAwlg3AMNHzuO86L7VdT/FjYL8nM7i0Rf33AuWpvlKoQ7AGIsmS2FpkV/RBiFkflgrU
QCS5TYsU4AdVjGlUUdPRuJ5if4TNyLg/qAvEe/q5CrCNrtaCseGj7v5Ys/vT7+vb1aRRcXRDvAH5
rw3Foz/Qx0nuxHxHNUxPYyjaksM90B7Aq1iLfffrVXPVr0pQWCdRRmQxcoUSUcq+wJaz9uh3LwuI
ceJiMWtFerqv61pWCseWpPI7So+AFGvstJHeEg==
Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id h2qhd42fmd43 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:31:05 +0000 (envelope-from )
From: \"Avon\"
To:
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Beijo_bom_=C3=A9_com_Batom_Avon?=
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:31:05 -0600
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-ID: <514006344.xt.local>
X-SFMC-Stack: 11
x-job: 514009019_742396
Message-ID:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=\"79UoAY0jGIY8=_?:\"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1
X-Spam-Score: -150
X-Spam-Bar: ---------------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\\@localhost for details.
Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...]
Content analysis details: (-15.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror)
-7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM
welcome-list
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF
welcome-list
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
area
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
identical to background
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author\'s domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted
Colors in HTML
X-Spam-Flag: NO