Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id 4GUcIOx+GWaxVQAAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:35:24 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:35:24 -0300 Received: from mta5.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.8]:46660) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvLji-0005gT-1H for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:35:24 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version: List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=C1Hg9GPa7WwUXFsIkSauH36tLvBrG5LlTbGTdc9gMng=; b=B8yGBmQqwDKA5+qXXYL8HdWMEGwhsctuACzYeVc9FrPtnZ3B3djZWFNMKGsbjJksRDa1T3RslphE a6K34mwmqjsYVlFZ51x5KcV8/iqraVLp+WmT0K0ZQ5n06QfGRxncYuJCtatSvyxzpIFQMPdPXFL6 67MZtxFiRwJcQO/h7slMzztxTXcgAa+uZb0YmfIKNDV8Lt3XgHsMy8gpAr5RJ6521Q+x2iLJuL81 xL+SUjM6GsyI0tlRPbIMMdDjYb7JiQRou1/2Ao+y75jPyqzcA54ATM/4MQwE5bDZEAeMZtckL0l/ b9xEJkRdiemLD3tRwsfFSKxbwPHNVn5K6GbFzQ== Received: by mta5.hello.avon.com id h35ve02fmd4k for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:34:30 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Vamos_conversar_sobre_o_Dia_das_M=C3=A3es=3F?= Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:34:30 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_743824 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"IsCKeiNqAKDU=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 X-Spam-Score: -75 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-7.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM welcome-list 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author\'s domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML X-Spam-Flag: NO