Return-Path:
Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Received: from cloud.mkt.tools
by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP
id CaOHKvCCT2ZIWwAAaNiWHg
(envelope-from )
for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300
Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:49520)
by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.96.2)
(envelope-from )
id 1sACe5-00063Z-1s
for renata@bewonderful.com.br;
Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version:
List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com;
bh=UFNgVIBZrUTxpLyj5EglPn5VdDV0aZc0lBpBmGnazMo=;
b=Gh/SRkORbueBSmzWgukQtl2q1shmxk0WgYL8iaFvbh4rqVO2un6NT8G0E313nz6i1JVGPxuf/0p/
SIjNUnjGmELhwi/MryHfmjh6IiXfpabfdpIvHOLRBXHduYtvTXt5RQ5uv7AYnt80Ov2F9xtVfPJ+
qC/vUncRe/PgFqax/phsXq89DhApb4DYs9Xa/jN52fOQ/GaVDC4V7D7JydFa3nF+qGHLOyqpSug/
k7LO1GBI1EVwFfg0YmTOQ8z1gupakIxQVm2DjOYUrNH1g43LM98i+9vKzkUp+lPv4A9lZcGO/l5y
aBXXNdWUVCbCEhA/6qbiKjT4icURVMnFsbLmEg==
Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id h9u1e82fmd4j for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 17:54:03 +0000 (envelope-from )
From: \"Avon\"
To:
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?8J+agCBFeGNsdXNpdm8gc8OzIGFxdWkhIPCfpKk=?=
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:54:03 -0600
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-ID: <514006344.xt.local>
X-SFMC-Stack: 11
x-job: 514009019_753936
Message-ID: <1f47a159-f414-4efd-895e-1bcbef709d21@atl1s11mta498.xt.local>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=\"XDHngEBz9ZE0=_?:\"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6
X-Spam-Score: -75
X-Spam-Bar: -------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\\@localhost for details.
Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...]
Content analysis details: (-7.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror)
-7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM
welcome-list
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
identical to background
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author\'s domain
0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted
Colors in HTML
X-Spam-Flag: NO