Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id CaOHKvCCT2ZIWwAAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300 Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:49520) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sACe5-00063Z-1s for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Thu, 23 May 2024 14:54:56 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version: List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=UFNgVIBZrUTxpLyj5EglPn5VdDV0aZc0lBpBmGnazMo=; b=Gh/SRkORbueBSmzWgukQtl2q1shmxk0WgYL8iaFvbh4rqVO2un6NT8G0E313nz6i1JVGPxuf/0p/ SIjNUnjGmELhwi/MryHfmjh6IiXfpabfdpIvHOLRBXHduYtvTXt5RQ5uv7AYnt80Ov2F9xtVfPJ+ qC/vUncRe/PgFqax/phsXq89DhApb4DYs9Xa/jN52fOQ/GaVDC4V7D7JydFa3nF+qGHLOyqpSug/ k7LO1GBI1EVwFfg0YmTOQ8z1gupakIxQVm2DjOYUrNH1g43LM98i+9vKzkUp+lPv4A9lZcGO/l5y aBXXNdWUVCbCEhA/6qbiKjT4icURVMnFsbLmEg== Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id h9u1e82fmd4j for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 17:54:03 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?8J+agCBFeGNsdXNpdm8gc8OzIGFxdWkhIPCfpKk=?= Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:54:03 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_753936 Message-ID: <1f47a159-f414-4efd-895e-1bcbef709d21@atl1s11mta498.xt.local> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"XDHngEBz9ZE0=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 X-Spam-Score: -75 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-7.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM welcome-list 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author\'s domain 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML X-Spam-Flag: NO