Return-Path:
Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Received: from cloud.mkt.tools
by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP
id S2XOE8MxUmYfDgAAaNiWHg
(envelope-from )
for ; Sat, 25 May 2024 15:45:23 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 May 2024 15:45:23 -0300
Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:59300)
by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.96.2)
(envelope-from )
id 1sAwNt-0000uC-11
for renata@bewonderful.com.br;
Sat, 25 May 2024 15:45:23 -0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version:
List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com;
bh=cVaHz20P5GWmxubad8mv66S/F5h41fXuAvOCTWrIIL0=;
b=02p2NDo2SkfKgLkBPpgIQYAGbmHjfv1ppIlz2fChz96XwaguO2QXFLky2z4HcLU2jQVXRLfpLyTP
UzIEV63c/3oE89g7EwwgEdqKSTCtKQx0FljgYqGBfS75iDoQuJNPctNjMnbqkfcLo8W57X223YtR
pUQdlkRqmzfvoVEYSOMuS6692G2fw3O+08opl18PS6Bj+rQ7VPlZLGDALTRcAhTuGVI/wjRY2qTy
vbuyMi/Ay1q1oZAos7WlzM/wg8cBFUUPHMgJeAn72E8JB2VUpR/RIsg3msD6WM8grRxWcFu3MtgT
r6GbpiqYVu5hFpTyFZEm6/AioluYnVvV6r09Kg==
Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id ha8orc2fmd4e for ; Sat, 25 May 2024 18:44:29 +0000 (envelope-from )
From: \"Avon\"
To:
Subject: A P R O V E I T E!
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 12:44:28 -0600
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-ID: <514006344.xt.local>
X-SFMC-Stack: 11
x-job: 514009019_751981
Message-ID: <488ca660-45b4-49d6-b315-6cb11f2994b2@atl1s11mta500.xt.local>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=\"KIe30aChlVhL=_?:\"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-Spam-Score: -66
X-Spam-Bar: ------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\\@localhost for details.
Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...]
Content analysis details: (-6.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
-7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF
welcome-list
0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
area
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
identical to background
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
Alignment
0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted
Colors in HTML
0.1 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t
0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
X-Spam-Flag: NO