Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id stGBMnB1lWbpxiIAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:16:00 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:16:00 -0300 Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:37150) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sTRAl-00000009Yo7-2RDa for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:16:00 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version: List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=iWettxTBK7wBoRTT0NrQj8Yq7hZ7JRyAMTjPnDH6drk=; b=QwMGvU0rSLxi8X8l1MZ1EKCTLxdi/2g0KRHBztOD+62651XqceHyOEYRDcuycm0h/Q5QFMAXUZp7 pLltEwWJr2L/rGYQy/aY7TokglN2ySjfAAZNec6GPKiPDzCUdNxBdZMwShGHKW3gE6CJTNbvLL+5 uL3iNsNotnXFaiioKqpfH6fnM1MiwjZrmROXT9UWqLI6chdqEVgRK406myqozmkhcH2AkScFRqeh w4j5My8t3Tfm0xp2SjOSwCgYTZ6grVl5487Vx9fXdI8nCDm64McSUf7hXjWTMhptXvw2zxY15DI8 RjD6swtj1ZqspXl1rVmg7GJiiTx9IIYKd9Z3kQ== Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id hilqm62fmd4e for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:15:06 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?8J+TjCBQZXNxdWlzYSBpbXBvcnRhbnRlOiBEaWEgZG9zIFBhaXM=?= Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:15:06 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_768250 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"BA1UV9ba6RJ9=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 X-Spam-Score: -75 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-7.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM welcome-list 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author\'s domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML X-Spam-Flag: NO