Return-Path: Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br Received: from cloud.mkt.tools by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP id 0JOOHG5WqWZQfwkAaNiWHg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300 Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:56367) by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sYu5L-00000002bqc-11XZ for renata@bewonderful.com.br; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version: List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com; bh=OL6LBgcCmvLY9700CG4wr1mchSQ5vt8dCxdG4a9U2IQ=; b=cV663j+T7KfhkraaGqAhEF9E+L1I+Q+LypR+lim6hvGgNJzVJhJWTeQbeq69boYzpAMxIfKUkCI1 /JpYkkixt43Xfv/8IpPFYwUzoVKRM/nT46jGc36nWmcYNeRBViG1STl+/08XU0QrCkmzCU137dQt qCFpuT/Q1oGk1Sj1zCirLMnSqDipgjl1KMtdWP2eFwfbP+xlDOx5vreBxcLhovh29J4QjDOnKt/r r3FIulxib31DE86GuaqzdwhjJ5p9nTF/oa+ANYIDYC9ow1tzgL2f9wUE2G0jOFWaW7dx92aAJXi1 SW4Pf/EiOZAyAk4SQ2Okh+vstbAHwkbUAFoEXA== Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id hl5b622fmd4s for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:08:08 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: \"Avon\" To: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?w5psdGltYSBvcG9ydHVuaWRhZGUg8J+aqA==?= Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:08:08 -0600 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: <514006344.xt.local> X-SFMC-Stack: 11 x-job: 514009019_774505 Message-ID: <97723b4f-073b-467d-827e-41b275fa2a6c@atl1s11mta498.xt.local> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=\"pEmbvKiSQgoH=_?:\" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 X-Spam-Score: -72 X-Spam-Bar: ------- X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\\@localhost for details. Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (-7.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF welcome-list 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML 0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment X-Spam-Flag: NO