Return-Path:
Delivered-To: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Received: from cloud.mkt.tools
by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP
id 0JOOHG5WqWZQfwkAaNiWHg
(envelope-from )
for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: renata@bewonderful.com.br
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300
Received: from mta2.hello.avon.com ([13.111.175.5]:56367)
by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.97.1)
(envelope-from )
id 1sYu5L-00000002bqc-11XZ
for renata@bewonderful.com.br;
Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:09:02 -0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=11dkim1; d=cf.avon.com;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post:MIME-Version:
List-ID:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=email@cf.avon.com;
bh=OL6LBgcCmvLY9700CG4wr1mchSQ5vt8dCxdG4a9U2IQ=;
b=cV663j+T7KfhkraaGqAhEF9E+L1I+Q+LypR+lim6hvGgNJzVJhJWTeQbeq69boYzpAMxIfKUkCI1
/JpYkkixt43Xfv/8IpPFYwUzoVKRM/nT46jGc36nWmcYNeRBViG1STl+/08XU0QrCkmzCU137dQt
qCFpuT/Q1oGk1Sj1zCirLMnSqDipgjl1KMtdWP2eFwfbP+xlDOx5vreBxcLhovh29J4QjDOnKt/r
r3FIulxib31DE86GuaqzdwhjJ5p9nTF/oa+ANYIDYC9ow1tzgL2f9wUE2G0jOFWaW7dx92aAJXi1
SW4Pf/EiOZAyAk4SQ2Okh+vstbAHwkbUAFoEXA==
Received: by mta2.hello.avon.com id hl5b622fmd4s for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:08:08 +0000 (envelope-from )
From: \"Avon\"
To:
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?w5psdGltYSBvcG9ydHVuaWRhZGUg8J+aqA==?=
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:08:08 -0600
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-ID: <514006344.xt.local>
X-SFMC-Stack: 11
x-job: 514009019_774505
Message-ID: <97723b4f-073b-467d-827e-41b275fa2a6c@atl1s11mta498.xt.local>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=\"pEmbvKiSQgoH=_?:\"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3
X-Spam-Score: -72
X-Spam-Bar: -------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\\@localhost for details.
Content preview: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...]
Content analysis details: (-7.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-7.5 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL From: address is in the default SPF
welcome-list
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
identical to background
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted
Colors in HTML
0.1 DKIM_INVALID DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
Alignment
X-Spam-Flag: NO