Return-Path: <revisao@revisaline.com.br>
Received: from cloud.mkt.tools
	by cloud.mkt.tools with LMTP
	id 2ODMODY7BGfGagkAaNiWHg
	(envelope-from <revisao@revisaline.com.br>); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:49:10 -0300
Return-path: <revisao@revisaline.com.br>
Envelope-to: adm@bewonderful.com.br,
 renata@bewonderful.com.br
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:49:10 -0300
Received: from smtp-sp217-109.kinghost.net ([191.6.217.109]:57371)
	by cloud.mkt.tools with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <revisao@revisaline.com.br>)
	id 1sxtiu-00000002aXh-3Oij;
	Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:49:10 -0300
Received: from webmail-worker-cli-06.kinghost.net (imap-vip-01-farm16.kinghost.net [191.6.216.4])
	(Authenticated sender: revisao@revisaline.com.br)
	by smtp-sp217-109.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5AC6B4182FBF;
	Mon,  7 Oct 2024 16:47:52 -0300 (-03)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkim.kinghost.net;
	s=king1; t=1728330472; bh=qDxt629RnRbpxsOC0QOiFrKNDe0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GuFatwDtC8CFADIt5W7mJT57VVh9tDcWU6DgwGXstQMDefjdVf1iUAlXCQQGFP8Rx
	 2WlGBt3nWlYyCML0riJazLB756IdPjxZuYuWDC+KzKEtuxOpuDnOzW1I4E2hgdfHWl
	 kFXE+ESqmCB4TNsELkIYsbllxobQl1JEVoSFJAzg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:47:52 -0300
From: revisao@revisaline.com.br
To: Renata de Cristofaro <renata@bewonderful.com.br>
Cc: adm@bewonderful.com.br
Subject: Nota fiscal
In-Reply-To: <QiI77FTaEOoLwoOBrJ0EqykjqUZoDhCukg9XbXAQdkA@www.mkt.tools>
References: <QiI77FTaEOoLwoOBrJ0EqykjqUZoDhCukg9XbXAQdkA@www.mkt.tools>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/Final
Message-ID: <2a000fea1aab885ec3863388b325336e@revisaline.com.br>
X-Sender: revisao@revisaline.com.br
Organization: RevisaLine
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=\"=_a729220c81f6c2ce8beaf639f01eb0cc\"
X-SND-ID: CqkygdJm1+mW451hHjEok3vjo8lP98bQIiN1hJYtbLGLC+qTScqpHmYATwho
	8aJkYbzyNm4ph6W4FKniRE+83fwKJCVjbVCJjaABYqI2HjiJO+GyR9JW+e5/
	S1cSc6CE6jhKL9GbEVeKifYFGNJk5nQyOonBw5dEpnLaVpLKoe3OSl1+Mrql
	3fUr0jGyGGKYzUU9I+Erv+mDsyyXzw4b6A8nDiFbvaKziNoMf28Dq9/3flh9
	TX3LxOgAAg4BkZtO4dmXBrTM1L3STdaqtDuOUMOF0IwBP8elz1/2B+8CcNUN
	Dq8cqO7sL+0YtrqzE4BvB0wi7Et2x+2/sVwWiy2yRjEYaDbO/SlC/rlHTcSj
	794Y8c/l10qamfIDCL6lOGhcgrf0ZjEBOX6v+GRl1YT78iT4qJlDTOIPJ2RD
	xpqB1BVP9L1qjJsFFOcIoMj7AIdNSIT1VvWh4HpDSLy46evs8N/TZlCS0mII
	ec1H60Cxy7kxtCmNAQCANTb4yo+IqYgK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8
X-Spam-Score: 18
X-Spam-Bar: +
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system \"cloud.mkt.tools\",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Renata, boa tarde! Tudo bem? Segue a nota. [], 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR   SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR      URI: Uses a numeric IP address in URL
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02    BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
                             area
  1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08     BODY: HTML: images with 400-800 bytes of
                             words
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Spam-Flag: NO